Humans are rather susceptible to errors as yourself should know given how many you've carried out during your SW debating No problem. The quote you referenced was his personal interpretation of Lucas's beliefs. :)Īlso, whether or not Pablo Hidalgo holds any authority on the matter is questionable at best. I'm happy to let those in this thread decide which interpretation is more viable myself. Now, while I know you're not above arguing such drivel, it's my opinion that Lucas did not intend to suggest that Vader was beneath TPM Kenobi and rather they meant the alternative I provided in my own post. I already addressed that one ( along with every other Vader quote ) in my post: Palpatine in RotS is not the same as Palpatine in ESB. Not unless Sidious himself never grew between RotS and the OT which we know isn't the case. None of that suggests Vader would be incapable of surpassing his former self in terms of power. At the time, he had the power to challenge his master, his injuries made it so he no longer had the power to do so and he was never able to catch up due to his loss of potential capping him below his master ( 80% per Lucas ).
George Lucas is perfectly correct to suggest that Vader has lost power and potential due to his injuries on Mustafar and he of course brings it up to highlight why Vader is currently subservient to the Emperor. While that logic is pretty strong, I have to admit to a bit of skepticism.ĮSB is the height of his powers prior to RotJ, correct. The being who hunted down the remnants of the PT era Jedi who survived the initial Purge and has often faced and defeated multiple Jedi from that era simultaneously is less powerful than PT era Jedi.
0 kommentar(er)
